Redshift Quality Codes

Explanation of quality codes used in DEEP2 DR1 and general rules regarding their meaning/use:
Q=4
Rock-solid z value with at least two clear features. Distinctly double [OII] 3727Å counts as two features.
Q=3
Good z value, probability > 90% that it is correct. At least two features still required, but ID is more doubtful than Q=4. Covers instances in which [OII] 3727Å is fuzzy and merged; identification of [OII] 3727Å is very likely, but not 100% sure. Also covers cases when one (or both) of the two required features has lower S/N.
Q=2
Not usable for the redshift catalog at this time, but SPECTRUM SHOULD BE REVISITED, either because a redshift MIGHT be possible with further looking, or because there is a bad reduction that might be fixed up. All Q=2 cases should have a comment flag. The most common reasons for Q=2 include:
Q=1
The redshift is not usable and the data will never yield one. The data are of such poor intrinsic quality that a redshift is hopeless. Q=1 means that the data will never be looked at again for any reason (as far as we can foresee now). The most frequent reason for Q=1 is low S/N. Note: if the redshift has been ruined by a bad reduction and there is some hope of rehabilitation through re-reduction, use Q=2. If the redshift has been ruined by a "catastrophically" bad reduction, oftimes unfixable, use Q=-2. See further discussion below on difference between Q=2 and Q=-2.
Q=0
The default value. Means spectrum has not yet been examined.
Q=-1
Star
Q=-2
The reduction and/or instrumental effects are so bad that, no matter how bright the object is, we cannot obtain a redshift for it; effectively, this object was never observed. Such cases can ONLY be diagnosed by checking the 2d spectrum. Q=-2 is needed to keep proper statistics on successful vs. failed redshifts. The division between cases Q=-2 and cases Q=2/bad-reduction (above) is clearly fuzzy, but a helpful list of guidelines for Q=-2 has been written by Jeff Newman. The main criterion is catastrophic vs. minor problems in the reduction: if it's catastrophic, use Q = -2; if not catastrophic, use Q=2. "Catastrophic" means that we are prevented from getting any significant shot at deriving a redshift, and this would have been true no matter how bright the object was. Most of the reasons in Jeff's list for Q=-2 are NOT FIXABLE through better reductions, though occasionally one might be. Even though the division might not be perfect, the fixable vs. non-fixable criterion might be a useful guideline to decide between Q=-2 and Q=2/bad-reduction, in addition to the basic notion that any galaxy would have been wiped out regardless of magnitude.

See Also

Comment Flags
Explanation of comment codes which can be assigned to spectra.